Is Sarah Palin a Cover Story to Steal the Election?
I found a scary article over at Mark Crispin Miller’s blog. In “Why They Chose Sarah Palin”, Mark asserts that Palin is just a convenient cover to mask voter fraud. He alleges that there aren’t enough fundies to explain Bush’s 2004 reelection. Bush’s disapproval rating was too high, and the numbers don’t add up. Instead, the election was stolen through tampering with the electronic voting machines (among other techniques). As the media were trying to come up with an explanation for how the pre-election polling could have been so wrong, the Bushkavites advanced the story that his win was due to a last-minute surge by the so-called “values voters”. McCain’s pick of Sarah Palin is intended to cover the same vote tampering in this election.
I don’t know how true this is. The vast majority of mainstream news outlets are all owned by just a few giant corporations, so no investigative reporting ever comes out of them anymore. That just leaves the smaller independents, who usually don’t have the resources to do all of the digging required to break these stories. Even when they do, it doesn’t get covered by the mainstream media, so the vast unwashed masses never find out and vote accordingly.