Comments on: Regulatory Malfunction Overturned

By: Sue Blue

Sue Blue — Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:13:25 +0000

What a sadist bastard the fundy god must be - he creates women with beautifully round, ripe boobies, caps them off with lovely little spouts that can both feed a baby and be fun to play with - then makes it a sin to look at them, even for two seconds. And he (God) needs the FCC to tell everybody, not just fundies, that they can’t look at any tits, ever, or hear any dirty words, because it might turn us all into raving perverts. But blazing guns, bombs, spurting blood, oozing brains and exploding intestines is just ducky, because god’s (and the Reichstag’s) other best friend is the NRA.

However, the Pikachu pic gives me hope. At least cute cartoon-creature hoo-haws aren’t off limits yet.

By: Parrotlover77

Parrotlover77 — Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:35:43 +0000

yunshui - Remember, the fundies have no issues with objectifying women. Women are sex objects to them even if they self-loathe the human obsession with teh sex. Anything remotely sexual is sexual. Breast feeding is not a natural part of the child rearing process, it's pornographic because sometimes men like to do other things to the boobies and nipples. That's why the ideal fundie state for a woman is shrouded in a burqa. That way there is no risk that a man might get a little horny and distracted from God.

By: Parrotlover77

Parrotlover77 — Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:30:53 +0000

ginger - for extra irony sauce, it’s usually the conservative fundies that stereotype the ebil libruhls into getting bent out of shape all the time with regard to the environment, social justice, and so on. You know — the whole “bleeding heart” insult.

By: yunshui

yunshui — Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:16:01 +0000

Surely children like nipples? I couldn’t get enough of them when I was a kid. Are the FCC suggesting that breastfeeding is a sin, equivalent to letting your precious infant watch Anal Action 3 whilst sniffing coke from the posterior of a syphilitic hooker? (I never did that as a child, by the way - Mum & Dad were very strict about that sort of thing)

By: ginger1981

ginger1981 — Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:50:37 +0000

Sometimes I doubt that it is really even that big of an issue to the fundies…it’s just something for them to be “outraged” about. I’ve never seen a group of people that are as constantly “outraged” at something as they are. How difficult it must be to go throughout life never feeling relaxed for one second because you must always be “outraged” at something.

I should do some research into this (but something tells me there isn’t much data on this): what is the percentage of fundies who have nervous breakdowns due to their tightly regulated/controlled lifestyle? It would be absolutely difficult to maintain this sort of lifestyle without cracking at some point.

By: cognitive dissident

cognitive dissident — Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:51:01 +0000

That image of Pika-coochie is *hilarious*…thanks for making my morning!

By: matt

matt — Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:57:11 +0000

In olden days it would be shocking if you saw a bit of stocking
now lord knows, anything goes!!

By: Parrotlover77

Parrotlover77 — Mon, 28 Jul 2008 04:55:45 +0000

ONN is slipping. They didn’t mention “activist judges” once. It took over halfway through the comments to find this gem…

I thought that it was the FCC’s job to determine what should and should not be fined for indecent or vulgarity on TV. I guess not, I guess it is to the activist judges on the bench. Judicial activism strikes again.

I was worried I was going to miss my judicial activism fix! Thanks, dear commentor, for not leaving me hanging!

Sometimes it’s hard to tell the difference between OneNewsNow and the other ONN: the Onion News Network.