Comments on: You Might StumbleUpon a Hate Site. Like This One. http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/299/you-might-stumbleupon-a-hate-site-like-this-one Keeping the Radical Right at Bay Wed, 07 Jan 2009 08:20:51 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: ausyoyo http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/299/you-might-stumbleupon-a-hate-site-like-this-one#comment-9499 ausyoyo Fri, 14 Dec 2007 01:24:14 +0000 http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/299/you-might-stumbleupon-a-hate-site-like-this-one#comment-9499 May be the d is the mark ms doll got in science? I've noticed the right wing love to call left wing sites hate sites. Anyway who disagrees with them encourages a furious response. May be the d is the mark ms doll got in science? I’ve noticed the right wing love to call left wing sites hate sites. Anyway who disagrees with them encourages a furious response.

]]> By: vjack http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/299/you-might-stumbleupon-a-hate-site-like-this-one#comment-9497 vjack Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:02:22 +0000 http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/299/you-might-stumbleupon-a-hate-site-like-this-one#comment-9497 I wonder if anyone expressing a different point of view of that reviewer automatically qualifies as hate speech. I wonder if anyone expressing a different point of view of that reviewer automatically qualifies as hate speech.

]]> By: The Watcher http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/299/you-might-stumbleupon-a-hate-site-like-this-one#comment-9495 The Watcher Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:02:51 +0000 http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/299/you-might-stumbleupon-a-hate-site-like-this-one#comment-9495 Since when are creationism and evolution on equal scientific footing? Since when are creationism and evolution on equal scientific footing?

]]> By: Arkonbey http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/299/you-might-stumbleupon-a-hate-site-like-this-one#comment-9491 Arkonbey Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:02:13 +0000 http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/299/you-might-stumbleupon-a-hate-site-like-this-one#comment-9491 What ddoll doesn't understand is that a belief in creationism undermines many important aspects of science. Especially those relating to biology, geology and climatology. What she also missed is that many creationists dismiss the facts because they don't agree with the bible (a millenia old document most of its readers do not read in its original language). Finally, she missed the fact that Creationists do no usually 'live and let live' themselves. What ddoll doesn’t understand is that a belief in creationism undermines many important aspects of science. Especially those relating to biology, geology and climatology.

What she also missed is that many creationists dismiss the facts because they don’t agree with the bible (a millenia old document most of its readers do not read in its original language).

Finally, she missed the fact that Creationists do no usually ‘live and let live’ themselves.

]]>