Comments on: Discovery Institute—The Modern Martin Luther King http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/287/discovery-institutethe-modern-martin-luther-king Keeping the Radical Right at Bay Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:56:00 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: ericsan http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/287/discovery-institutethe-modern-martin-luther-king#comment-8961 ericsan Fri, 30 Nov 2007 23:31:29 +0000 http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/287/discovery-institutethe-modern-martin-luther-king#comment-8961 The ones who scream the loudest against homosexuality are the same who eventually get caught tap dancing in public toilets, like Larry Craig, Ted Haggart, Bob Allen and their friends. There is a very obvious reason to explain why they spend so much time discussing it. If they were straight most of their time and energy would be devoted to pussy! The ones who scream the loudest against homosexuality are the same who eventually get caught tap dancing in public toilets, like Larry Craig, Ted Haggart, Bob Allen and their friends. There is a very obvious reason to explain why they spend so much time discussing it. If they were straight most of their time and energy would be devoted to pussy!

]]> By: Michael Nietzsche http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/287/discovery-institutethe-modern-martin-luther-king#comment-8850 Michael Nietzsche Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:20:18 +0000 http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/287/discovery-institutethe-modern-martin-luther-king#comment-8850 Excuse my language.............. Krixstians bring out the WORST in me!!!!!! Because they're so f--king stupid! Sometimes listening to them makes my head want to explode! Excuse my language………….. Krixstians bring out the WORST in me!!!!!! Because they’re so f–king stupid! Sometimes listening to them makes my head want to explode!

]]> By: Michael Nietzsche http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/287/discovery-institutethe-modern-martin-luther-king#comment-8849 Michael Nietzsche Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:18:18 +0000 http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/287/discovery-institutethe-modern-martin-luther-king#comment-8849 You know the old saying.... He who dealt it smelt it???? Maybe those Krizstians are somehow trying to tell us all that.... they're all QUEER for Geebus???? I wonder how many of them would suck his dick and lick his asshole if he re-appeared today??? You know the old saying…. He who dealt it smelt it???? Maybe those Krizstians are somehow trying to tell us all that…. they’re all QUEER for Geebus???? I wonder how many of them would suck his dick and lick his asshole if he re-appeared today???

]]> By: Michael Nietzsche http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/287/discovery-institutethe-modern-martin-luther-king#comment-8848 Michael Nietzsche Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:15:16 +0000 http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/287/discovery-institutethe-modern-martin-luther-king#comment-8848 Can I start wikiing the bible to correct all the pathetically stupid inacurracies in that disgusting book???? Can I start wikiing the bible to correct all the pathetically stupid inacurracies in that disgusting book????

]]> By: ausyoyo http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/287/discovery-institutethe-modern-martin-luther-king#comment-8831 ausyoyo Wed, 28 Nov 2007 01:11:26 +0000 http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/287/discovery-institutethe-modern-martin-luther-king#comment-8831 I think the funniest/saddest thig about conservapedia is that the top 9 viewed articles were about gay sex (from a screwy fundie point of view). Talk about a monomania! It's not just evolution these guys are denying! I think the funniest/saddest thig about conservapedia is that the top 9 viewed articles were about gay sex (from a screwy fundie point of view). Talk about a monomania! It’s not just evolution these guys are denying!

]]> By: ParrotLover77 http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/287/discovery-institutethe-modern-martin-luther-king#comment-8816 ParrotLover77 Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:54:25 +0000 http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/287/discovery-institutethe-modern-martin-luther-king#comment-8816 Wikipedia has bots that do a pretty good job (getting better by the version) of spotting defacement even obscure articles. I never have liked wikipedia's "live right now" editing methodology for absolutely anybody (oh, what wonders a mandatory 24 hour waiting period for edits to go live by newbies would do to cut down on defacement) but it is what it is. Print articles have errors too, but at least wiki's can be edited immediately. ...And also locked from further sabotage by senior editors. The system works relatively well. The key to wikipedia research is to FOLLOW THE SOURCE LINKS FOR QUOTES! In fact, the "how to use Wikipedia for research" article ON Wikipedia says exactly that. Researchers (or more likely kids doing reports) need to use wikipedia (or any encyclopedia for that matter) as a starting point for learning general information and then RESEARCH THE CITED SOURCES for detailed information, quotes, and to fill up their Works Cited (or are they calling it bibliographies again?). Simple solution for a not complicated problem. Guess what happens when you have unadultered free speech? Sometimes you hear things you don't like. That doesn't make the medium of delivery bad. I think the 700 Club is brain rotting garbage, but that doesn't make everything on TV bad. Just as the occassional defaced article on Wikipedia doesn't make Wikipedia's entire resource bad. Wikipedia has bots that do a pretty good job (getting better by the version) of spotting defacement even obscure articles. I never have liked wikipedia’s “live right now” editing methodology for absolutely anybody (oh, what wonders a mandatory 24 hour waiting period for edits to go live by newbies would do to cut down on defacement) but it is what it is. Print articles have errors too, but at least wiki’s can be edited immediately. …And also locked from further sabotage by senior editors. The system works relatively well. The key to wikipedia research is to FOLLOW THE SOURCE LINKS FOR QUOTES! In fact, the “how to use Wikipedia for research” article ON Wikipedia says exactly that. Researchers (or more likely kids doing reports) need to use wikipedia (or any encyclopedia for that matter) as a starting point for learning general information and then RESEARCH THE CITED SOURCES for detailed information, quotes, and to fill up their Works Cited (or are they calling it bibliographies again?). Simple solution for a not complicated problem.

Guess what happens when you have unadultered free speech? Sometimes you hear things you don’t like. That doesn’t make the medium of delivery bad. I think the 700 Club is brain rotting garbage, but that doesn’t make everything on TV bad. Just as the occassional defaced article on Wikipedia doesn’t make Wikipedia’s entire resource bad.

]]>