<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Browser Issues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/240/browser-issues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/240/browser-issues</link>
	<description>Keeping the Radical Right at Bay</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ron Britton</title>
		<link>http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/240/browser-issues#comment-6668</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Britton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/240/browser-issues#comment-6668</guid>
		<description>XHTML 1.0 Transitional seems to be the Word Press default.  Maybe that's because I use deprecated commands such as _blank.

Firefox is the main browser people use to view this site (37%), followed by IE7 (22%).

Maybe MS finally got religion with IE7, but older versions were designed around a lot of MS-specific non-standard tags.  I won't support that.

I've never understood why it has taken so many years for the browser developers to implement the complete W3C standards.  They've been in place for quite a while now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>XHTML 1.0 Transitional seems to be the Word Press default.  Maybe that&#8217;s because I use deprecated commands such as _blank.</p>
<p>Firefox is the main browser people use to view this site (37%), followed by IE7 (22%).</p>
<p>Maybe MS finally got religion with IE7, but older versions were designed around a lot of MS-specific non-standard tags.  I won&#8217;t support that.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never understood why it has taken so many years for the browser developers to implement the complete W3C standards.  They&#8217;ve been in place for quite a while now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ParrotLover77</title>
		<link>http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/240/browser-issues#comment-6664</link>
		<dc:creator>ParrotLover77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/240/browser-issues#comment-6664</guid>
		<description>Microsoft has a free VHD (updated quarterly) with use with the free Virtual PC that is basically a plain-Jane XP install with IE6, just for this kind of situation.  It allows web developers to check compatibility with IE6 and IE7.

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=21EABB90-958F-4B64-B5F1-73D0A413C8EF&#38;displaylang=en

Incidently, if you changed "XHTML 1.0 Transitional" to "XHTML 1.0 Strict" IE7 will render differently (closer to "true" standards compliancy).  FireFox and IE7 both fail standards tests pretty miserably, but IE7's "backward compatibility" makes some things more apparent.  Double edged sword.  If IE7 was 100% standards compliant, many many websites (and CHM help files and HTML controls in any forms apps) would have been broken and that would have been BAD.

Pain in the ass, but I always code for IE7 first, then Firefox, then IE6, basically in order of market penetration.  Of course I always test on Opera too, but it's hardly needed because somehow those guys make things render perfect no matter what browser it's "worked around" for!  MS needs to buy the Opera rendering engine for IE8.  I swear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft has a free VHD (updated quarterly) with use with the free Virtual PC that is basically a plain-Jane XP install with IE6, just for this kind of situation.  It allows web developers to check compatibility with IE6 and IE7.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=21EABB90-958F-4B64-B5F1-73D0A413C8EF&amp;displaylang=en" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=21EABB90-958F-4B64-B5F1-73D0A413C8EF&amp;displaylang=en</a></p>
<p>Incidently, if you changed &#8220;XHTML 1.0 Transitional&#8221; to &#8220;XHTML 1.0 Strict&#8221; IE7 will render differently (closer to &#8220;true&#8221; standards compliancy).  FireFox and IE7 both fail standards tests pretty miserably, but IE7&#8217;s &#8220;backward compatibility&#8221; makes some things more apparent.  Double edged sword.  If IE7 was 100% standards compliant, many many websites (and CHM help files and HTML controls in any forms apps) would have been broken and that would have been BAD.</p>
<p>Pain in the ass, but I always code for IE7 first, then Firefox, then IE6, basically in order of market penetration.  Of course I always test on Opera too, but it&#8217;s hardly needed because somehow those guys make things render perfect no matter what browser it&#8217;s &#8220;worked around&#8221; for!  MS needs to buy the Opera rendering engine for IE8.  I swear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lex</title>
		<link>http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/240/browser-issues#comment-6514</link>
		<dc:creator>Lex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 17:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/240/browser-issues#comment-6514</guid>
		<description>That reminds me of the loving pictures I pose for with my Apple IIc. I think I'm in love....with this blog. Mind if I add you to my humble blogroll? Ahh, if only I had known about such "fundie watch" sites earlier, I wouldn't have felt so alone in my quest to utterly destroy them. Now I know and all is again right in the universe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That reminds me of the loving pictures I pose for with my Apple IIc. I think I&#8217;m in love&#8230;.with this blog. Mind if I add you to my humble blogroll? Ahh, if only I had known about such &#8220;fundie watch&#8221; sites earlier, I wouldn&#8217;t have felt so alone in my quest to utterly destroy them. Now I know and all is again right in the universe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doug livesey</title>
		<link>http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/240/browser-issues#comment-6508</link>
		<dc:creator>doug livesey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 14:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/240/browser-issues#comment-6508</guid>
		<description>Hear hear!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hear hear!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
