Creationists work extremely hard to prop up their house of cards, as the above comment illustrates. If anyone is confused by his ramblings, you should watch this video: Cheetahs Disprove Noah’s Ark.

This is tale which tells what recessive genes hold, what inbreeding cause’s and what degenerate animals look like.

A male lion breeds with a female tiger, makes a liger of great size!
2

a male leopard breed with a female lion brings forth a leopon. Which not only has the size and strength of the lion but also has the climbing abilities of the leopard.
3

All that has so far been said, is recognized by science.
4

Now into the realm of what has not yet been ‘validated’ (by science).
5

All the other cats are said to interbreed
from time to time.
6

The division of Species is based on the idea that, only members of the same ‘Species’ can indeed breed.
But if all cats ( including the Egyptian house cat) can breed, they are not different Species but only subspecies of the original cat.

Now, if the liger is bigger and the leopon is of the same size and better. Then it comes to reason that the original cat from off the Ark was a super cat.
Scientists say that the “extra” abilities that come out of these ‘hybrids’ are caused by “recessive genes”
Recessive Genes are created by inbreeding.

Now here is the part that might interest a historian.

Gen 7:2

“Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee by sevens, the male and his female: and of beasts that are not clean by two, the male and his female.”

In this I think that the clean animals were allowed to descend without inbreeding and therefore pure. While the others were forced into inbreeding, which caused their abilities to go into ‘Recessive genes’. The ancients had enough trouble with the lions, tigers, etc. So this might have been set to preserve man. Did you know that in India they breed the wild dog with the wolf to get a bigger breed. This alone means nothing, except that there is a story whcih appeared shortly after the flood. No later that 500 years, or 600, or 700, etc, after the flood. The story told of a great king who had wolves so great that his men were able to ride upon them, for they were far greater than any horse.

Maybe I’m going nowhere, but if only two cats, two dogs, two bears, etc, walked off the Ark. Then I say that it would immediately force inbreeding, which in turn would force abilities to go into recessive genes. And (to the point) would force the super Cat to degenerate into the lion, tiger, leopard, cheetah and house cat that we have today.

I’m sorry I couldn’t help joking and calling the lion and tiger a degenerate.

“In the production of pure breeds of sheep, cattle, hogs, and horses inbreeding has frequently been practiced extensively, and where in such cases selection has been made of the more vigorous offspring as parents, it is doubtful whether any diminution in size, vigor, or fertility has resulted. Nevertheless it very frequently happens that when two pure breeds are crossed, the offspring surpass either pure race in size and vigor.”

Sudden Origins by Jeffrey H. Schwartz

The tiger is either a pure breed are a degenerate species!
Or I say.
They are one and the same..!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Else, the reason why the clean were in sevens as opposed to the others.

Genetic research (and this basic reasoning and breeding) has shown that every type of wolf, dog, fox and coyote etc. came from the 1 original wolf.
Scott, John Paul and John L. Fuller Genetics and the Social Behavior of the Dog
Behaviour of Wolves, Dogs and Related Canines (Hardcover) by Michael W. Fox

Mitochondrial Eve (mt-mrca)

“Mitochondrial Eve is the ………..common ancestor (MRCA) of all human via the mitochondrial DNA pathway . In other words, she is the MRCA found when ancestry of all living humans is traced back in time, following only the maternal lineage. Mitochondrial DNA pathway is equivalent to maternal lineage, because Mitochondrial DNA is only passed down from mother to child, never father to child. [1]”

Camel-Llama-alpaca

All known subspecies of the “horse” are known to breed!

1 Last thing.
this theory is observable & testable, in that you can breed new ‘breeds’ of dogs in just a few years. But each of these will have less ‘ablities’ than the last.

Just take 2 dogs (of your choice) & place them in a zoo. Now there children will be fine but as there children breed with each other you will see the same thing happen. Only it will go ten times further than before.

Kentish Son

I am sending this into the world because I want to get the word out.

As far as respect goes, that is something that has to be earned. The creationists’ grasp of biology is so incorrect that not only can I not respect them, they have actually earned my disrespect.

Breathtaking!!

Indeed, the proprietor appears to have no self-awareness whatsoever, as was stated above.

Here is an internet website, a public forum, given over to “attacking” and ridiculing other people … particularly people of faith, which, as has been pointed out, overwhelmingly includes the proprietor …

… yet he whines and opines that he is being “attacked” when those he has been “attacking” respond to his malevolent jibes!

This is quite astonishing in its double-standard and acute lack of self-awareness.

“Do as I say, not as I do” says Mr Britton.

OB should apologise for not checking his facts .. or for making presumptions … but Mr Britton can quickly correct the record since it IS his website.

So it turns out that Mr Britton IS in fact a lettered scientist.

We would naturally love to know more about the details of your degrees, qualifications, publications, achievements etc.

We would ask whether they stack up against the towering track record of those Mr Britton “attacks”, such as the following:

Creation Scientist Biographies

We find it doubtful, and would accordingly, cordially and respectfully invite Mr Britton to go back to mama and ask her to teach him how to have respect for others, particularly those who are his betters.

He seems never to have learned that lesson.

Instead of attacking people, why don’t you simply provide some evidence for your absurd claims? I don’t mean that shit that you call evidence. I mean real, credible, verifiable, evidence that can stand up to peer review. I don’t mean your peers, either. If you want to play in this ballpark, you need to assemble a team. T-ball doesn’t cut it.

Here’s a website, a public proclamation if you will, by a non-scientist, non-engineer, non-biologist .. essentially an un-lettered man … who accuses university professors, scientists, Ph.Ds etc of “SPOUTING OFF“.

And he doesn’t even see the contradiction - it’s almost painful.

Ah, the Left.

I just read your bio over at AIG. Apparently you are a skilled and well-regarded physicist. This does not make you an expert in every science. Your statements about evolution show a colossal lack of understanding of the subject.

Who’s in denial here? The bacterial flagellum is hardly simple … unless you ascribe ’simplicity’ to electric motors, stators, rotors, high-speed bearings etc.

Tell me you’re not a professional engineer … you surely would not regard such important and intelligent inventions as trivial happenstance, the inevitable outcome of throwing metals, molecules and materials around?

It could not ‘evolve’ such parts separately by random copying errors (mutations), let alone ‘evolve’ a production line for assembly, nor ‘evolve’ a system of reproduction.

What I find remarkable about this kind of evolutionism is the complete lack of self-awareness.

There is this ridiculing of the faith of others, not stopping to think or consider for one moment just how much of their own position is based on faith and presupposition.

When it ridicules the faith of others, it is, ipso facto, ridiculing itself.

“Keeping the radical right at bay” Good slogan! You’ve joined the titanic struggle between right and wrong…and you support the dark side.

I’m just trying to preserve the Constitution. Thank you for telling us which side you think Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, and George Washington are on.

I present both mockery and truth on this website. Some articles have more of one than the other. You obviously haven’t read the rest of the site.

I’ve presented real proof of evolution in some of the articles. If you’re still confused and need more proof, I suggest you check out the links in the sidebar under “Evolution Explained”.

Repentance and rebirth can set you free. You are closer than you think!

Sorry. Ever since Roe v. Wade, I’ve had freedom of choice. My rebirth has been aborted.

Cute mockery is your weapond of choice… is that because truth is not part of your arsenal?

Satire can serve both sides…but is not pretty. I used it in http://www.emperorswithoutclothes.com and I support it with reasoned argument.

If you attempt to present real proof of real evolution, you will soon discover that there is none.

Repentance and rebirth can set you free. You are closer than you think!

Some of them even use evolution to explain how Noah’s Ark could hold a bazillion animals. It didn’t have to! All it had to do was hold a few holobaramins and let the modern animals evolve from those, once they stepped off the ark. Of course, there are no transitional fossils to support that idea!

For more about this stuff, see these prior articles:

Fundie Taxonomy
Kangaroos: Jumping to the Wrong Conclusions with Conservapedia
Don’t be Kind