<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is God Good?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/148/is-god-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/148/is-god-good</link>
	<description>Keeping the Radical Right at Bay</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ron Britton</title>
		<link>http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/148/is-god-good#comment-2580</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Britton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 09:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/148/is-god-good#comment-2580</guid>
		<description>Why is a theology professor reading my crappy blog?!

Anyway, I guess I don't follow your question.  The Bible attributes some pretty nasty behavior to God.  If God is good, doesn't that mean that all of his behavior is good?  Since his behavior clearly isn't good, then the definition of goodness exists outside of God.

Are you saying that the Bible is a highly suspect document, considering its age and provenance?  Therefore, we don't really know what God is like?  If that's what you mean, I would agree with you.  In that case, the quotation I presented and my comments upon it really only discredit the notion that the Bible is an accurate description of God.

I'm really only here to show the flaws in fundie behavior and thinking, not to discredit religion as a whole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is a theology professor reading my crappy blog?!</p>
<p>Anyway, I guess I don&#8217;t follow your question.  The Bible attributes some pretty nasty behavior to God.  If God is good, doesn&#8217;t that mean that all of his behavior is good?  Since his behavior clearly isn&#8217;t good, then the definition of goodness exists outside of God.</p>
<p>Are you saying that the Bible is a highly suspect document, considering its age and provenance?  Therefore, we don&#8217;t really know what God is like?  If that&#8217;s what you mean, I would agree with you.  In that case, the quotation I presented and my comments upon it really only discredit the notion that the Bible is an accurate description of God.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m really only here to show the flaws in fundie behavior and thinking, not to discredit religion as a whole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James McGrath</title>
		<link>http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/148/is-god-good#comment-2558</link>
		<dc:creator>James McGrath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 16:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/148/is-god-good#comment-2558</guid>
		<description>Aren't you simply granting the fundamentalists' assumption that the Bible actually tells what God says God is like, as opposed to what ancient people thought God was like? 

http://blue.butler.edu/~jfmcgrat/blog/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t you simply granting the fundamentalists&#8217; assumption that the Bible actually tells what God says God is like, as opposed to what ancient people thought God was like? </p>
<p><a href="http://blue.butler.edu/~jfmcgrat/blog/" rel="nofollow">http://blue.butler.edu/~jfmcgrat/blog/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenda</title>
		<link>http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/148/is-god-good#comment-2197</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 21:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/148/is-god-good#comment-2197</guid>
		<description>True. Morality can be often be derailed by organized religion. How else does one explain Pat Robertson?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True. Morality can be often be derailed by organized religion. How else does one explain Pat Robertson?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
