<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Power of Nightmares #1 (Baby, It&#8217;s Cold Outside)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/1196/the-power-of-nightmares-1-baby-its-cold-outside/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/1196/the-power-of-nightmares-1-baby-its-cold-outside#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Keeping the Radical Right at Bay</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:44:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShesUhmazinqx3</title>
		<link>http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/1196/the-power-of-nightmares-1-baby-its-cold-outside/comment-page-1#comment-48022</link>
		<dc:creator>ShesUhmazinqx3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 22:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/?p=1196#comment-48022</guid>
		<description>Omqq Yur so Violent ! This is the Most Horrible thinq Iseen In Years Yuh Need a exorcismm !!!!!! Satanist !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Omqq Yur so Violent ! This is the Most Horrible thinq Iseen In Years Yuh Need a exorcismm !!!!!! Satanist !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parrotlover77</title>
		<link>http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/1196/the-power-of-nightmares-1-baby-its-cold-outside/comment-page-1#comment-36392</link>
		<dc:creator>Parrotlover77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/?p=1196#comment-36392</guid>
		<description>They discovered my super sekrit plan!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They discovered my super sekrit plan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parrotlover77</title>
		<link>http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/1196/the-power-of-nightmares-1-baby-its-cold-outside/comment-page-1#comment-36391</link>
		<dc:creator>Parrotlover77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/?p=1196#comment-36391</guid>
		<description>D&#039;OH!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D&#8217;OH!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dvsrat</title>
		<link>http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/1196/the-power-of-nightmares-1-baby-its-cold-outside/comment-page-1#comment-36387</link>
		<dc:creator>dvsrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/?p=1196#comment-36387</guid>
		<description>The word &quot;boobies&quot; does imply socialism, in that, Jesus did rise from the dead. 

--- You follow my logic here....

ergo the existence of turnips is solid proof of the Book of Ecclesiastes in the Holy Bible...

So, I&#039;m sure you see where I&#039;m going with this.

When Abraham said in Genesis 22:8 &quot;And Abraham said, My son, God will provide himself a lamb for a burnt offering: so they went both of them together.&quot;

Then the true meaning... I mean the TRUE MEANING of Jesus can be heard.

&quot;Therefore&quot; Jesus said, and in no uncertain terms, &quot;I sayeth unto you -- that there will be no boobies shown on TV -- is that clear!!!???&quot;

Janet Jackson just wasn&#039;t paying attention to what Jesus was saying that day. 

And she did it.

&quot;Whateth parteth of &#039;no boobies on TV&#039; do you not understandeth?&quot; Yelled Jesus!

And the USA violateth Jesus&#039; commandment with the help of Janet Jackson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The word &#8220;boobies&#8221; does imply socialism, in that, Jesus did rise from the dead. </p>
<p>&#8212; You follow my logic here&#8230;.</p>
<p>ergo the existence of turnips is solid proof of the Book of Ecclesiastes in the Holy Bible&#8230;</p>
<p>So, I&#8217;m sure you see where I&#8217;m going with this.</p>
<p>When Abraham said in Genesis 22:8 &#8220;And Abraham said, My son, God will provide himself a lamb for a burnt offering: so they went both of them together.&#8221;</p>
<p>Then the true meaning&#8230; I mean the TRUE MEANING of Jesus can be heard.</p>
<p>&#8220;Therefore&#8221; Jesus said, and in no uncertain terms, &#8220;I sayeth unto you &#8212; that there will be no boobies shown on TV &#8212; is that clear!!!???&#8221;</p>
<p>Janet Jackson just wasn&#8217;t paying attention to what Jesus was saying that day. </p>
<p>And she did it.</p>
<p>&#8220;Whateth parteth of &#8216;no boobies on TV&#8217; do you not understandeth?&#8221; Yelled Jesus!</p>
<p>And the USA violateth Jesus&#8217; commandment with the help of Janet Jackson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Modusoperandi</title>
		<link>http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/1196/the-power-of-nightmares-1-baby-its-cold-outside/comment-page-1#comment-36382</link>
		<dc:creator>Modusoperandi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 06:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/?p=1196#comment-36382</guid>
		<description>You realize that you&#039;ll get quotemined as implying that it &lt;i&gt;eventually&lt;/i&gt; means dictatorship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You realize that you&#8217;ll get quotemined as implying that it <i>eventually</i> means dictatorship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parrotlover77</title>
		<link>http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/1196/the-power-of-nightmares-1-baby-its-cold-outside/comment-page-1#comment-36372</link>
		<dc:creator>Parrotlover77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/?p=1196#comment-36372</guid>
		<description>The Janet Jackson debacle and the faux outrage that followed nearly did...

But, as I said before, words are being unruined!  I never thought I&#039;d see the day that &quot;socialist&quot; wasn&#039;t such a bad word in the USA.  Awesome!  We can start being grown-ups again and realize that socialism, whether or not your agree with it, does not immediately mean dictatorship, like China or Cuba.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Janet Jackson debacle and the faux outrage that followed nearly did&#8230;</p>
<p>But, as I said before, words are being unruined!  I never thought I&#8217;d see the day that &#8220;socialist&#8221; wasn&#8217;t such a bad word in the USA.  Awesome!  We can start being grown-ups again and realize that socialism, whether or not your agree with it, does not immediately mean dictatorship, like China or Cuba.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Modusoperandi</title>
		<link>http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/1196/the-power-of-nightmares-1-baby-its-cold-outside/comment-page-1#comment-36368</link>
		<dc:creator>Modusoperandi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/?p=1196#comment-36368</guid>
		<description>They love ruining words. Words are knives, a weapon of convenience, rather than, um, words. I hope they never ruin &quot;boobies&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They love ruining words. Words are knives, a weapon of convenience, rather than, um, words. I hope they never ruin &#8220;boobies&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parrotlover77</title>
		<link>http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/1196/the-power-of-nightmares-1-baby-its-cold-outside/comment-page-1#comment-36337</link>
		<dc:creator>Parrotlover77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/?p=1196#comment-36337</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;That “liberal” is considered by a large number (if not a majority) of Americans to be a bad word indicates just how fucked up your country is.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Increasingly less true, actually.  That was more of a 90s and early 2000s thing.  The fact that it has been thrown up against wildly popular figures (example: Obama) has neutralized the word.  

In fact, the word &lt;em&gt;socialist&lt;/em&gt; (yes, the &quot;S&quot; word! ZOMG!) has also been neutralized.  I wish I had the link on hand, but something like 45% of America now has a neutral or positive view of the word socialist.  The largest gap seems to be the age divide.  Those who nostalgically remember the cold war (WOLVERINES!) seem to think it&#039;s just icky to be socialist.  The younger generation... not so much.

You will notice that republicans are more frequently throwing the word &lt;em&gt;fascist&lt;/em&gt; against Obama these days.  That happened immediately after the survey I am referencing.  You sometimes might hear &lt;em&gt;liberal&lt;/em&gt; or &lt;em&gt;socialist&lt;/em&gt; combined with  &lt;em&gt;fascist&lt;/em&gt;, but you will rarely hear them alone as a slander anymore.  With the exception of possibly some congressional reps from districts where being anything left of Cheney will get you shot... you know, in the face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>That “liberal” is considered by a large number (if not a majority) of Americans to be a bad word indicates just how fucked up your country is.</p></blockquote>
<p>Increasingly less true, actually.  That was more of a 90s and early 2000s thing.  The fact that it has been thrown up against wildly popular figures (example: Obama) has neutralized the word.  </p>
<p>In fact, the word <em>socialist</em> (yes, the &#8220;S&#8221; word! ZOMG!) has also been neutralized.  I wish I had the link on hand, but something like 45% of America now has a neutral or positive view of the word socialist.  The largest gap seems to be the age divide.  Those who nostalgically remember the cold war (WOLVERINES!) seem to think it&#8217;s just icky to be socialist.  The younger generation&#8230; not so much.</p>
<p>You will notice that republicans are more frequently throwing the word <em>fascist</em> against Obama these days.  That happened immediately after the survey I am referencing.  You sometimes might hear <em>liberal</em> or <em>socialist</em> combined with  <em>fascist</em>, but you will rarely hear them alone as a slander anymore.  With the exception of possibly some congressional reps from districts where being anything left of Cheney will get you shot&#8230; you know, in the face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Britton</title>
		<link>http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/1196/the-power-of-nightmares-1-baby-its-cold-outside/comment-page-1#comment-36310</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Britton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 03:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/?p=1196#comment-36310</guid>
		<description>Modusoperandi:

&lt;blockquote&gt;…but it also spawned &lt;i&gt;The Electric Company&lt;/i&gt;, so it wasn’t all crap.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;ll have to take your word for that part of it.  Everybody my age also has fond memories of &lt;i&gt;Schoolhouse Rock&lt;/i&gt; and the original cast of &lt;i&gt;Saturday Night Live&lt;/i&gt;, facts that still baffle me.

I&#039;m actually going to go out on a limb and say that despite the &#039;70s strangeness (or maybe because of it), that decade was, overall, pretty good to me.  I wasn&#039;t as eager to see it go as everyone else was.  Remember that it was followed immediately by the Reagan era, so it&#039;s not like it was replaced by something better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Modusoperandi:</p>
<blockquote><p>…but it also spawned <i>The Electric Company</i>, so it wasn’t all crap.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ll have to take your word for that part of it.  Everybody my age also has fond memories of <i>Schoolhouse Rock</i> and the original cast of <i>Saturday Night Live</i>, facts that still baffle me.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m actually going to go out on a limb and say that despite the &#8217;70s strangeness (or maybe because of it), that decade was, overall, pretty good to me.  I wasn&#8217;t as eager to see it go as everyone else was.  Remember that it was followed immediately by the Reagan era, so it&#8217;s not like it was replaced by something better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Modusoperandi</title>
		<link>http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/1196/the-power-of-nightmares-1-baby-its-cold-outside/comment-page-1#comment-36305</link>
		<dc:creator>Modusoperandi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/?p=1196#comment-36305</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Ron Britton&lt;/b&gt; &lt;i&gt;As you rightly pointed out, this website takes a black and white view of conservatism. That’s why I don’t understand what your objection is. Actually, the grayness, which I’ve mentioned before, is that I’m not tarring all conservatives with this brush. I actually want a real (i.e., small government, low tax, anti-authoritarian) conservative party in this country. This website is just devoted to the black parts of the gray.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

I don&#039;t see where the confusion is. You call them Neo-Cons, rather than cons. Conservatism is small government, low tax, anti-authoritarian. &lt;i&gt;Neo&lt;/i&gt;-conservatism is small government (except where it isn&#039;t), low tax (for the rich and corporations and rich corporations), anti-authoritarian (except your superiors. Obey!). &quot;Conservatism&quot; (preferably small-c) is more pre-Reagan Republican party. Neo-con is pretty much everybody after that. Mod-Repubs are &quot;RINOs&quot; now, because in the black &amp; white world of the neo-con/Christian Right, &quot;If you&#039;re not for us, yer agin&#039; us.&quot;

Of course, I say this while being one of them weirdo vaguely-socialistic foreigners. Your left is our center. Your right is right out to lunch. That &quot;liberal&quot; is considered by a large number (if not a majority) of Americans to be a bad word indicates just how fucked up your country is.

&lt;i&gt;&quot;The 1970s were more than just disco. It was also the Pet Rock, bell bottoms, 8-track tapes, the Partridge Family, and thousands of other atrocities.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Ah, but it also spawned &lt;i&gt;The Electric Company&lt;/i&gt;, so it wasn&#039;t all crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Ron Britton</b> <i>As you rightly pointed out, this website takes a black and white view of conservatism. That’s why I don’t understand what your objection is. Actually, the grayness, which I’ve mentioned before, is that I’m not tarring all conservatives with this brush. I actually want a real (i.e., small government, low tax, anti-authoritarian) conservative party in this country. This website is just devoted to the black parts of the gray.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see where the confusion is. You call them Neo-Cons, rather than cons. Conservatism is small government, low tax, anti-authoritarian. <i>Neo</i>-conservatism is small government (except where it isn&#8217;t), low tax (for the rich and corporations and rich corporations), anti-authoritarian (except your superiors. Obey!). &#8220;Conservatism&#8221; (preferably small-c) is more pre-Reagan Republican party. Neo-con is pretty much everybody after that. Mod-Repubs are &#8220;RINOs&#8221; now, because in the black &amp; white world of the neo-con/Christian Right, &#8220;If you&#8217;re not for us, yer agin&#8217; us.&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course, I say this while being one of them weirdo vaguely-socialistic foreigners. Your left is our center. Your right is right out to lunch. That &#8220;liberal&#8221; is considered by a large number (if not a majority) of Americans to be a bad word indicates just how fucked up your country is.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;The 1970s were more than just disco. It was also the Pet Rock, bell bottoms, 8-track tapes, the Partridge Family, and thousands of other atrocities.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Ah, but it also spawned <i>The Electric Company</i>, so it wasn&#8217;t all crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dvsrat</title>
		<link>http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/1196/the-power-of-nightmares-1-baby-its-cold-outside/comment-page-1#comment-36296</link>
		<dc:creator>dvsrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/?p=1196#comment-36296</guid>
		<description>Yes, the great psychiatrist Jouhian Hilmbilb Schnygsky noted that the individual born before January 1, 1966 is most definitely better capable of explaining Disco than those born after that particular date. 

Case in point; Dr. Schnygsky posed this particular test...

Can anyone born after January 1, 1966 explain this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vv-5EOAOTQM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the great psychiatrist Jouhian Hilmbilb Schnygsky noted that the individual born before January 1, 1966 is most definitely better capable of explaining Disco than those born after that particular date. </p>
<p>Case in point; Dr. Schnygsky posed this particular test&#8230;</p>
<p>Can anyone born after January 1, 1966 explain this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vv-5EOAOTQM" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vv-5EOAOTQM</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OtherRob</title>
		<link>http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/1196/the-power-of-nightmares-1-baby-its-cold-outside/comment-page-1#comment-36295</link>
		<dc:creator>OtherRob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 03:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/?p=1196#comment-36295</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;I was born in ‘66 and I can’t explain disco at all&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If you were born a year earlier you would be able to.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I forgot all about the Great &#039;65/&#039;66 Disco Schism....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<blockquote><p>I was born in ‘66 and I can’t explain disco at all</p></blockquote>
<p>If you were born a year earlier you would be able to.</p></blockquote>
<p>I forgot all about the Great &#8217;65/&#8217;66 Disco Schism&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

