<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eugenie Scott on Science Friday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/1163/eugenie-scott-on-science-friday/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/1163/eugenie-scott-on-science-friday#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Keeping the Radical Right at Bay</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:44:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gustavo Keener</title>
		<link>http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/1163/eugenie-scott-on-science-friday/comment-page-1#comment-38427</link>
		<dc:creator>Gustavo Keener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 02:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/?p=1163#comment-38427</guid>
		<description>This is brilliant.  Eugenie Scott is one of my favorite people at the forefront of this debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is brilliant.  Eugenie Scott is one of my favorite people at the forefront of this debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parrotlover77</title>
		<link>http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/1163/eugenie-scott-on-science-friday/comment-page-1#comment-36109</link>
		<dc:creator>Parrotlover77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 19:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/?p=1163#comment-36109</guid>
		<description>Arkonbey - I remember segments like that too.  They were presented in a way though that showed the mistakes of the thought and how it led to the leading scientific theories.  If we taught ID that way, the creationists would go apeshit.  They want ID taught as a &lt;em&gt;valid&lt;/em&gt; alternative.  At least in my high school, alchemy, astrology, and spontenaous generation were all taught as archaic and incorrect.

Of course, that&#039;s how creationism and ID &lt;em&gt;should&lt;/em&gt; be taught, but doing so would make even more moderate christians join the ID crowd, which would be very, very bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arkonbey &#8211; I remember segments like that too.  They were presented in a way though that showed the mistakes of the thought and how it led to the leading scientific theories.  If we taught ID that way, the creationists would go apeshit.  They want ID taught as a <em>valid</em> alternative.  At least in my high school, alchemy, astrology, and spontenaous generation were all taught as archaic and incorrect.</p>
<p>Of course, that&#8217;s how creationism and ID <em>should</em> be taught, but doing so would make even more moderate christians join the ID crowd, which would be very, very bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arkonbey</title>
		<link>http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/1163/eugenie-scott-on-science-friday/comment-page-1#comment-36106</link>
		<dc:creator>Arkonbey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/?p=1163#comment-36106</guid>
		<description>This reminded me of something slightly OT. Yesterday afternoon I was watching a DVD of Cosmos, the episode about evolution. Now, I thought, the IDers want ID to be taught in schools, and the routinely claim that ID is not religious. 

Ok. Let&#039;s have the ID proponents formulate a lesson plan. What the heck would that look like? How could they possibly teach about the origin of life with a &#039;designer&#039; without referencing some religious text? It&#039;s impossible. Forcing them to show a lesson plan for a biology class would show their true colors.

Actually, I&#039;m all FOR teaching ID in school. I mean, in my freshman high school biology class we learned about spontaneous generation. In chemistry, we touched on alchemy. By all means, let&#039;s teach ID, especially if the proponents can&#039;t come up with non-religious lesson plans we can just show that it&#039;s as dumb as SG and alchemy and astrology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reminded me of something slightly OT. Yesterday afternoon I was watching a DVD of Cosmos, the episode about evolution. Now, I thought, the IDers want ID to be taught in schools, and the routinely claim that ID is not religious. </p>
<p>Ok. Let&#8217;s have the ID proponents formulate a lesson plan. What the heck would that look like? How could they possibly teach about the origin of life with a &#8216;designer&#8217; without referencing some religious text? It&#8217;s impossible. Forcing them to show a lesson plan for a biology class would show their true colors.</p>
<p>Actually, I&#8217;m all FOR teaching ID in school. I mean, in my freshman high school biology class we learned about spontaneous generation. In chemistry, we touched on alchemy. By all means, let&#8217;s teach ID, especially if the proponents can&#8217;t come up with non-religious lesson plans we can just show that it&#8217;s as dumb as SG and alchemy and astrology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Britton</title>
		<link>http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/1163/eugenie-scott-on-science-friday/comment-page-1#comment-36105</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Britton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 13:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/?p=1163#comment-36105</guid>
		<description>PaulJ and MathMike:

Thank you for your links.  The Science Friday website is still linking to an oceanography report, so I don&#039;t think they plan to put up a link to this segment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PaulJ and MathMike:</p>
<p>Thank you for your links.  The Science Friday website is still linking to an oceanography report, so I don&#8217;t think they plan to put up a link to this segment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MathMike</title>
		<link>http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/1163/eugenie-scott-on-science-friday/comment-page-1#comment-36104</link>
		<dc:creator>MathMike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 11:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/?p=1163#comment-36104</guid>
		<description>I was able to get it through &lt;a href=&quot;http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?i=53288278&amp;id=216152964&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;Open iTunes and go to the podcast.&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;iTunes&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was able to get it through <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?i=53288278&#038;id=216152964" target="_blank" title="Open iTunes and go to the podcast." rel="nofollow">iTunes</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulJ</title>
		<link>http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/archives/1163/eugenie-scott-on-science-friday/comment-page-1#comment-36093</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 17:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bay-of-fundie.com/?p=1163#comment-36093</guid>
		<description>MP3 available &lt;a href=&quot;http://rapidshare.com/files/220150322/TalkOfTheNation_EugenieScott_NPRi-20090410.mp3&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;Go to file at RapidShare. Opens in new window.&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MP3 available <a href="http://rapidshare.com/files/220150322/TalkOfTheNation_EugenieScott_NPRi-20090410.mp3" target="_blank" title="Go to file at RapidShare. Opens in new window." rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

